أنشئ حسابًا أو سجّل الدخول للانضمام إلى مجتمعك المهني.
A simple RC Low Pass Filter has the transfer function
Cascading filters similar to the one above will give rise to quadratic equations in the denominator of the transfer function and hence further complicate the response of the filter. In fact, any second order Low Pass filter has a transfer function with a denominator equal to
and substituting different values of a, b and c determine the response of the filter over frequency. Now, anyone who remembers high school maths will notice that the above statement can have a value of zero for certain values of s, given by the equation
hence our transfer function can present infinite gain.
In the previous filter tutorials we looked at simple first-order type low and high pass filters that contain only one single resistor and a single reactive component (a capacitor) within their RC filter circuit design.
In applications that use filters to shape the frequency spectrum of a signal such as in communications or control systems, the shape or width of the roll-off also called the “transition band”, for a simple first-order filter may be too long or wide and so active filters designed with more than one “order” are required. These types of filters are commonly known as “High-order” or “nth-order” filters.
The complexity or Filter Type is defined by the filters “order”, and which is dependant upon the number of reactive components such as capacitors or inductors within its design. We also know that the rate of roll-off and therefore the width of the transition band, depends upon the order number of the filter and that for a simple first-order filter it has a standard roll-off rate ofdB/decade or6dB/octave.
Then, for a filter that has an nth number order, it will have a subsequent roll-off rate ofn dB/decade or6n dB/octave. So a first-order filter has a roll-off rate ofdB/decade (6dB/octave), a second-order filter has a roll-off rate ofdB/decade (dB/octave), and a fourth-order filter has a roll-off rate ofdB/decade (dB/octave), etc, etc.
High-order filters, such as third, fourth, and fifth-order are usually formed by cascading together single first-order and second-order filters.
For example, two second-order low pass filters can be cascaded together to produce a fourth-order low pass filter, and so on. Although there is no limit to the order of the filter that can be formed, as the order increases so does its size and cost, also its accuracy declines.
Decades and OctavesOne final comment about Decades and Octaves. On the frequency scale, a Decade is a tenfold increase (multiply by) or tenfold decrease (divide by). For example,2 toHz represents one decade, whereas toHz represents two decades ( toHz and then toHz).
An Octave is a doubling (multiply by2) or halving (divide by2) of the frequency scale. For example, toHz represents one octave, while2 toHz is three octaves (2 to4,4 to8 and finally8 toHz) doubling the frequency each time. Either way, Logarithmic scales are used extensively in the frequency domain to denote a frequency value when working with amplifiers and filters so it is important to understand them.
Since the frequency determining resistors are all equal, and as are the frequency determining capacitors, the cut-off or corner frequency ( ƒC ) for either a first, second, third or even a fourth-order filter must also be equal and is found by using our now old familiar equation:
As with the first and second-order filters, the third and fourth-order high pass filters are formed by simply interchanging the positions of the frequency determining components (resistors and capacitors) in the equivalent low pass filter. High-order filters can be designed by following the procedures we saw previously in the Low Pass and High Pass filter tutorials. However, the overall gain of high-order filters is fixed because all the frequency determining components are equal.
Filter ApproximationsSo far we have looked at a low and high pass first-order filter circuits, their resultant frequency and phase responses. An ideal filter would give us specifications of maximum pass band gain and flatness, minimum stop band attenuation and also a very steep pass band to stop band roll-off (the transition band) and it is therefore apparent that a large number of network responses would satisfy these requirements.
Not surprisingly then that there are a number of “approximation functions” in linear analogue filter design that use a mathematical approach to best approximate the transfer function we require for the filters design.
Such designs are known as Elliptical, Butterworth, Chebyshev, Bessel, Cauer as well as many others. Of these five “classic” linear analogue filter approximation functions only the Butterworth Filter and especially the low pass Butterworth filter design will be considered here as its the most commonly used function.
Low Pass Butterworth Filter DesignThe frequency response of the Butterworth Filter approximation function is also often referred to as “maximally flat” (no ripples) response because the pass band is designed to have a frequency response which is as flat as mathematically possible from0Hz (DC) until the cut-off frequency at -3dB with no ripples. Higher frequencies beyond the cut-off point rolls-off down to zero in the stop band atdB/decade or6dB/octave. This is because it has a “quality factor”, “Q” of just0..
However, one main disadvantage of the Butterworth filter is that it achieves this pass band flatness at the expense of a wide transition band as the filter changes from the pass band to the stop band. It also has poor phase characteristics as well. The ideal frequency response, referred to as a “brick wall” filter, and the standard Butterworth approximations, for different filter orders are given below.
Note that the higher the Butterworth filter order, the higher the number of cascaded stages there are within the filter design, and the closer the filter becomes to the ideal “brick wall” response.
In practice however, Butterworth’s ideal frequency response is unattainable as it produces excessive passband ripple.
Where the generalised equation representing a “nth” Order Butterworth filter, the frequency response is given as:
Where: n represents the filter order, Omega ω is equal to 2πƒ and Epsilon ε is the maximum pass band gain, (Amax). If Amax is defined at a frequency equal to the cut-off -3dB corner point (ƒc), ε will then be equal to one and therefore ε2 will also be one. However, if you now wish to define Amax at a different voltage gain value, for example1dB, or1. (1dB =logAmax) then the new value of epsilon, ε is found by:
Transpose the equation to give:
The Frequency Response of a filter can be defined mathematically by its Transfer Function with the standard Voltage Transfer Function H(jω) written as:
Note: ( jω ) can also be written as ( s ) to denote the S-domain. and the resultant transfer function for a second-order low pass filter is given as:
To help in the design of his low pass filters, Butterworth produced standard tables of normalised second-order low pass polynomials given the values of coefficient that correspond to a cut-off corner frequency of1 radian/sec.
n Normalised Denominator Polynomials in Factored Form 1 (1+s) 2 (1+1.s+s2) 3 (1+s)(1+s+s2) 4 (1+0.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2) 5 (1+s)(1+0.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2) 6 (1+0.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2) 7 (1+s)(1+0.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2) 8 (1+0.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2) 9 (1+s)(1+0.s+s2)(1+s+s2)(1+1.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2) (1+0.s+s2)(1+0.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2)(1+1.s+s2) Filter Design – Butterworth Low PassFind the order of an active low pass Butterworth filter whose specifications are given as: Amax =0.5dBat a pass band frequency (ωp) of radian/sec (.8Hz), and Amin = -dB at a stop band frequency (ωs) of radian/sec. Also design a suitable Butterworth filter circuit to match these requirements.
Firstly, the maximum pass band gain Amax =0.5dB which is equal to a gain of 1. (0.5dB =log A) at a frequency (ωp) of rads/s, so the value of epsilon ε is found by:
Secondly, the minimum stop band gain Amin = -dB which is equal to a gain of - (dB =log A) at a stop band frequency (ωs) of rads/s or.3Hz.
Substituting the values into the general equation for a Butterworth filters frequency response gives us the following:
Since n must always be an integer ( whole number ) then the next highest value to2. is n =3, therefore a “a third-order filter is required” and to produce a third-order Butterworth filter, a second-order filter stage cascaded together with a first-order filter stage is required.
From the normalised low pass Butterworth Polynomials table above, the coefficient for a third-order filter is given as (1+s)(1+s+s2) and this gives us a gain of 3-A =1, or A =2. As A =1 + (Rf/R1), choosing a value for both the feedback resistor Rf and resistor R1 gives us values of 1kΩ and 1kΩ respectively, ( 1kΩ/1kΩ +1 =2 ).
We know that the cut-off corner frequency, the -3dB point (ωo) can be found using the formula 1/CR, but we need to find ωo from the pass band frequency ωp then,
So, the cut-off corner frequency is given as rads/s or.2Hz, (/2π) and using the familiar formula 1/CR we can find the values of the resistors and capacitors for our third-order circuit.
Note that the nearest preferred value to0.uF would be0.uF, ornF.
and finally our circuit of the third-order low pass Butterworth Filter with a cut-off corner frequency of rads/s or.2Hz, a maximum pass band gain of0.5dB and a minimum stop band gain ofdB is constructed as follows.
