ابدأ بالتواصل مع الأشخاص وتبادل معارفك المهنية

أنشئ حسابًا أو سجّل الدخول للانضمام إلى مجتمعك المهني.

متابعة

Your stakeholders, a group of seven Ph.D.'s, have met to discuss the merits of moving forward with the_

project in a specific direction. The discussion started out fairly calmly until a point of contention was identified. At this point, the discussion began to escalate into an argument and finally ended in a shouting match between two of the Ph.D.'s. In addition, one of the members of the team had a differing opinion from his boss (one of the people engaged in the shouting match) and was reluctant to express his real

views in the meeting. Which of the following would have been the best approach to avoid the previous scenario?

a. Delphi technique

b. Analytic hierarchy process

c. The KJ method

d. QFD

user-image
تم إضافة السؤال من قبل Muhammad Farooq , QA-QC MANAGER , AL Bawani contracting co.
تاريخ النشر: 2016/05/12
Amr Gamal Anwar Hassan
من قبل Amr Gamal Anwar Hassan , مهندس حاسب كميات , Shurfah Real Estate Development and Investment

option A Delphi technique is the right answer

Mohamed Helal
من قبل Mohamed Helal , Project Manager , GROUP CONSULT INTERNATIONAL

I think the answer is  a. Delphi technique

Mohamed AMER
من قبل Mohamed AMER , Business Unit Head

The Delphi Method has a more orthodox approach that will allow participants to exchange their opinions and receive and give feedback. moreover, and since it employs anonymity, there will be a better chance of those who have political sensitivity to express their view more openly.

Ahmad Hussein
من قبل Ahmad Hussein , Senior Electrical Engineer , National Air Navigation Services Company (NANSC)

a. Delphi technique will be  the best

sardar mardookhy
من قبل sardar mardookhy , PMP certified Project manager , MCCI

Delphi which the experts do not meet each other and declare their view easily