Do you think that photojournalism is the backbone of propaganda spread by the Media? Why?

I totally agree that it can be a backbone of propaganda in the society. What makes a photojournalist stand out from the others is strictly maintaining media ethics which does not allow compromisation.

Yeah, it can be, but the a real photojournalist won't do that.

Photojournalism is meant to be used freely without getting under pressure of any race or party, literally propaganda is a harsh word, when it comes to spreading it by media, it will spoil the meaning and act of photojournalism in society and media. Audience will start hating it and ofcourse the opposition will utterly get the advantages of that. 

Yes's more influential, because the eye sees and analyzes the code image, and the content of the picture and intensify the meaning and use of color represents the philosophy of the art of advertising marketing industry.