Your project's primary constraint is quality. To make certain the project team members don't feel too pressed for time and to avoid schedule risk?

Hi

I'm going to use  the Quantitatively based duration.

Since its gives flixability to mange which part need to put your stuff under stress, and not the all project - even they will understand piority, and will help to get your target in thim. 

Analogous estimating+reserve analysis

I would use a blend of estimation tools based on the project environment, for example; quantitatively based duration is useful if you have a similar historic project or tasks to use as a baseline in addition to input from an expert in the either the project subject field, or in an expert field (e.g. Quality). 

Quality always Depent at quantity at exp;judgement

espert judgement is the need of the hour to assess the reasons for the quality constraints and to arrive at solutions to resolve the problems

1) In my perspective, if any individual employee is not able to complete his/her role properly as per job description then you must find out the reason behind of it why his/her performance is not up to the level and the corective action should be taken immediatley that includes Training, Motivating etc. 2) Monthly/Quarterly/a half-year/Yearly Training plan (as convenient to your operation schedule) must be set for each employee by identifying training needs during PDR and cunducting refresh training session on important topic.

It depends on project, if big one and invloves too much indicators and integrated then combination of all would work, for small project Quantitaively based duration would work best.

To make a certain project team I should Reserve analysis

 

D. Expert judgment

Provide problem solving for the team to help eliminate part shortages

In every business, Quality plays a vital importance. In order to maintain quality (either quality systems or product precision) it is better to make use of estimation tools and expert judgement to finalize duration, cost and product delivery.

 

 

D. Expert judgmentD. Expert judgmentD. Expert judgmentD. Expert judgment