Bayt.com

ابدأ بالتواصل مع الأشخاص وتبادل معارفك المهنية

أنشئ حسابًا أو سجّل الدخول للانضمام إلى مجتمعك المهني.

متابعة

There was a robbery in which a lot of goods were stolen. The robber(s) left in a truck. It is known that:

(1) Nobody else could have been involved other than A, B and C. (2) C never commits a crime without A's participation. (3) B does not know how to drive. So, is A innocent or guilty?

General Knowledge
user-image
تم إضافة السؤال من قبل Rehan Qureshi , Financial Consultant , Self Employeed
تاريخ النشر: 2013/12/09
التصويت كمفيد (8) المشاهدات (18) المتابعون (6) الإجابات (8) بلّغ عن السؤال
أضف إجابة
أنشئ حسابًا أو سجّل الدخول للإجابة
Ahamed Shareef
من قبل Ahamed Shareef , Divisional Head - Quality Assurance , Apollo Tyres Ltd

In your first condition, you implicated all the3 (A,B and C)!! And in the statement  makes all of them guilty!!

So A is guilty....

Rehan Qureshi
من قبل Rehan Qureshi , Financial Consultant , Self Employeed

yes A is guilty

Ragesh Vadakkedath Ramachandran
من قبل Ragesh Vadakkedath Ramachandran , IT Administrator , Nippon Motor Corporation (P) Ltd

A is guilty.

 

Reason,

 

1. B doesnt know how to drive , the robbers left in a truck that means either A or C supports B.

2. C cannot do a crime without A.

Aysha Rehan
من قبل Aysha Rehan , Customer Services Officer , National Data Base & Registration Authority Pakistan

Yes its simple A is guilty

Noman Qureshi
من قبل Noman Qureshi , Assistant Division Manager , Al Baroom Group, Saudi Arabia

my vote is for A as guilty

Mohammad Tohamy Hussein Hussein
من قبل Mohammad Tohamy Hussein Hussein , Chief Executive Officer & ERP Architect , Egyptian Software Group

A is guilty.

أضف إجابتك
المزيد من الأسئلة المماثلة