Register now or log in to join your professional community.
View expressed by Mr. Thiab deserves attention
Dear .,.. dear .. I really do NOT fancy these pre-coined terms about such number of things within something else.
Another consideration is the "context" and "boudaries" of the question !!
I personally reject this idea ... and do not think it is a good one
Instead, I would like to take each case on its own within its specifics and come up with a "pinpointed answer" for that case in its own specifics.
Few years ago, I had a similar discussion/debate about the number of perspectives in a balanced scorecard.
So, it is the same logic ,, and on my side .. it is the same approach that applies !!
and then I may come up with my answer that may have6 factors or more or less !!
Just a different professional view ... and thanks for your appreciation and acceptance !!