Register now or log in to join your professional community.
This depends on the nature of badness!
If a criticism's focus is objective, I can make use of it and consider it as something useful. If it is a mere aggression that lacks objectivity, I will ignore it. I think positively and deal with issues as they are!
Pretty much miffed, initially, of course! But then I think of my readers and reviewers as my precious friends who take time to read and write a bad/good review. I'd delve deep into the reasons why I got a bad review. If the bad review is not justified, I would not enter into an argument..........I'd rather one of my readers answer that review. But certainly, reviewing is as much the right of a critic as mine is to write and expect him/her to read what I write:)-
Well, I'd try not to take the critique personally; and might use it to improve myself.
I experienced that once. My work was badly reviewed by an unqualified critique. I wrote him back asking for the basis of his comments and pointing out one by one the issues he threw on me. Realizing that I knew my craft, he apologized to me.
Yes, if my work is badly reviewed by incompetent people, I asked for valid grounds. However, if I see that the review is for my own good, I'd consider them.
Do you need help in adding the right keywords to your CV? Let our CV writing experts help you.