Register now or log in to join your professional community.
I fully agree with the answer been added by MR Alex Al Yazouri .
thanks.
The employees may or may not evaluate Managers but Management or Employers do.
Everybody suppose to go through auditing and evaluations excluding Chairmen's and major shareholders but the mechanism is different.
You can evaluate your professor at university because he or she are getting paid to do the job, but mostly you cannot evaluate your manager, somebody will evaluate him or her, although you can make a complain if it's serious.
This happens in bigger organizations, managers get evaluated by their upper management and their peers. I do think that this approach should be used in all types of organizations, it'll at least help managers lead better teams and accomplish their goals much more efficiently.
It is done in360 Feedback analysis but not done in middle east
This is done in developed countries are managers of the staff evaluation
While in our country leaves our assessment of the mood of the manager and his personal opinion of us
Often
Employees can not evaluate the managers, but the higher management can simply conduct confidential feedback surveys among their employees. This way they can easily evaluate anyone.
It is like students conducting an exam for the teacher. Never in the history or never in the present or in the future it will happen. It is like doubting some one's integrity/ authority. This will totally ruin the texture of management.
In some organization employees participated on the phase of evaluation process during surveying as data gathering. But certainly the upper management level do the evaluation of the managers performance.
There are situations where employees and peers also evaluate managers through a360 degrees feedback and similar performance management systems. However this kind of evaluation is not used very much. Many companies stick to the regular performance review.
Actually they can. If the organization has-degree appraisal policy.
