Start networking and exchanging professional insights

Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow

What is one more effective? Standard ACL or Extended ACL

Please give me some recommendation to get a job.

user-image
Question added by Karthick Udaiappan , Hardware & Network Engineer , BIZNET IT SOLUTIONS
Date Posted: 2015/03/28
Osama Ismaeel
by Osama Ismaeel , Customer Solutions Architect - VPO (VPN Owner) , Orange Business Services

Extended ACL, it allowed specify src/dst ip@ and src/dst tcp/udp port

chinmaya dash dash
by chinmaya dash dash , L1 Network Engineer , Networkers Home Pvt Ltd

extended ACLs are more effective than standard ACLs, as extended ACL rules provide more options for filtering a packet , as with standard a packet can only be filtered based on source ip address

Hossam Hashish
by Hossam Hashish , IT Supervisor , DSG YAPI SAN TIC.ANONIM.SIRKTI

Standard ACLs

A standard IP ACL is simple; it filters based on source address only. You can filter a source network or a source host, but you cannot filter based on the destination of a packet, the particular protocol being used such as the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) or the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), or on the port number. You can permit or deny only source traffic.

Extended ACLs:

An extended ACL gives you much more power than just a standard ACL. Extended IP ACLs check both the source and destination packet addresses. They can also check for specific protocols, port numbers, and other parameters, which allow administrators more flexibility and control.

More Questions Like This