Register now or log in to join your professional community.
Repetition is bad for a writer as it creates hesitation to the reader, for an average reader repetition will be bordem and will preferably discontinue to read.
Repetition is good for presentation, as it will help the audience to be more thorough with main points in the absence of hand outs.
It shows a lack of a well planned and organized manuscripts. Repetition is good if the targeted audience are kindergarten students and preteens.
Repetition is good for brand recall. It can also lead to an aversion. In some cases, it is needed to drive home a point.
Repetition can be a reputation because the authors can do a masterpiece even without their conscious effort.
In it the praised and the required and the blameworthy
Repetition per se is neither good nor bad. If you are beating around the bush due to obscure direction in writing, you are lost and you leave the reader indignant; but if you repeat a certain point to ensure it does not get overlooked, then, you are doing your readers a valued service.
Therefore, a good sense on when to use them is imperative.
People always looks for creative and new things to read. If they find it repetitive in other sites they find it as common, not anything different in it. Thus it can lose your customers.
Repetition is evidence of the author's inability
It looses the interest of the reader. But for a teacher it is necessary to repeat thing so that his student could get the clear concept.
