Start networking and exchanging professional insights

Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow

If the debt is cheaper as compared to equity, why not all debt? Think about the businesses which are very stable, even though they are having equity.

user-image
Question added by Muhammad Imran , Corporate Finance and Management accounting tutor , London's Learning
Date Posted: 2013/08/29
Aziz ur Rehman ur Rehman
by Aziz ur Rehman ur Rehman , Assistant Manager Finance , Central Power Puchasing Agency (CPPA)

the value of firm depends upon the sum of (Debt + equity).
if your capital structure is totally based upon on debt component.
then your debt to equity ratio and also intrest time earned ratio will distrub threfore, ultimatlly a firm should be opt for suitabel debt and equity structure 

Muhammad Imran
by Muhammad Imran , Corporate Finance and Management accounting tutor , London's Learning

You are right. However finance manager job is to keep the cost of capital minimum. As you said that a firm should opt for suitable debt and equity structure, but what for this structure is required if we can get away with a cheaper source which is debt (more easy to arrange). According to theory that debt is risky as bank or debt holder can take over your asset in time when you will be unable to pay which sounds right. Nowadays when the banks have excess fund, they can restructure your debt as they did it for Dubai world. Isn't it that company failed to take right candidates for a specific job through recruitment consultant (useless), and these candidates lack skills of further research and following the same old ratio system. I think there is plenty of space for development in the field of finance.

More Questions Like This