Register now or log in to join your professional community.
Thanks
Await for more answers from colleagues
precedent is a decision already happened in a case. So it is considered as a law while decidng a similar cases.
In my opinion is two point of analise summary this question:
First: consistency in law application, similar solution in similar cases in different courts.
Second: instruments to improve actual legislations and forming new and actual (adapted to society needs) laws.
A 'Smart' Question indeed!
I fully endorse Your Wonderful/Constructive submission Mr. Gayasuddin Mohammed. Bundle of thanks.
- When there is an ambiguity in any provisions of law for applying the law to the case in hand.
- when there is any provision of law is defeating the very objective of the law for application to the case in hand.
- to follow the standards and consistency in the decisions
- guidance to sub-ordinate judiciary.
few points.
Thanks.