هل كثرة العمل والضغط وعدم الخصخصة في توزيع الاعمال له دور سلبي او ايجابي ؟ ولماذا؟

لها دور سلبى وايجابى ابدأ باليجابى الخبره طبعا يعنى لما اشتغل كمهندس كهربا باور وتحكم واجهزه هيبقى عندى خبره فى كل هذه التخصصات وايضا الراتب هيبقى زياده اما بقى السلبيات عدد ساعات عمل كتيره وضغط شغل كبير والتركيز هيقل طبعا

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

بالتأكيد سيكون له دور سلبي، لأنه من الطبيعي أن يكون هناك نظام متبع للعمل لكي يسير بالصورة المطلوبة فإذا لم يكن هناك خصخصة في توزيع الاعمال فمن المؤكد أن الكثير من المعاملات ستفقد مما يؤثر على خطة سير العمل بالسلب ومن ثَمَّ سقوط المنظمة

كثرة العمل والضغط وعدم الخصخصة في توزيع الأعمال له دور سلبي لأنه يُشتت التركيز فلا يضع الشخص إمكاناته في تطوير ملكاته ونفسه في مجال وتخصص واحد فلا يصل مرحلة التميز ولا في مجال من مجالات الأعمال التي قام بها

it has positive and negative impact, the positive impact is that it increase the imployees skills, knowledge and experience as well as increases his flexibility. 

The negative impact is that specialised tasks enrich the core value of the employees which make it more prefered by them. Also, it increase the employees efficiency and quality.

In general managers should understand what is required for business need, if they seek flexibility, then unspecialised tasks will be better while if they seek high quality and efficiency,specialised task is the best option.

 اعتقد انه ليس جيد  حيث ان العمل لايكون متقن  بسبب الضغط   وعدم تشغيل كل شخص في مكانه الصحيح وبالتالي تكثر الاخطاء ويتشتت العمل

Sir it depends upon a person who is going through that situation.  Stress is sometime positve some time very very negative.

Privatization, also spelled privatization, may have several meanings. Primarily, it is the process of transferring ownership of a business, enterprise, agency, public service or public property from the public sector (a government) to the private sector, either to a business that operate for a profit or to a nonprofit organization. It may also mean government outsourcing of services or functions to private firms, e.g. revenue collection, law enforcement, and prison management.

Privatization has also been used to describe two unrelated transactions. The first is the buying of all outstanding shares of a publicly traded company by a single entity, taking the company private. This is often described as private equity. The second is a demutualization of a mutual organization or cooperative to form a joint-stock company.

Privatization in the distribution business has both and negative roles.

Although private companies will provide a similar good or service alongside the government, opponents of privatization are careful about completely transferring the provision of public goods, services and assets into private hands for the following reasons:

·         Performance. A democratically elected government is accountable to the people through a legislature, Congress or Parliament, and is motivated to safeguarding the assets of the nation. The profit motive may be subordinated to social objectives.

·         Improvements. the government is motivated to performance improvements as well run businesses contribute to the State's revenues.

·         Corruption. Government ministers and civil servants are bound to uphold the highest ethical standards, and standards of probity are guaranteed through codes of conduct and declarations of interest. However, the selling process could lack transparency, allowing the purchaser and civil servants controlling the sale to gain personally.

·         Accountability. The public does not have any control or oversight of private companies.

·         Civil-liberty concerns. A democratically elected government is accountable to the people through a parliament, and can intervene when civil liberties are threatened.

·         Goals. The government may seek to use state companies as instruments to further social goals for the benefit of the nation as a whole.

·         Capital. Governments can raise money in the financial markets most cheaply to re-lend to state-owned enterprises.

·         Strategic and Sensitive areas. Governments have chosen to keep certain companies/industries under public control because of their strategic importance or sensitive nature.

·         Cuts in essential services. If a government-owned company providing an essential service (such as the water supply) to all citizens is privatized, its new owner(s) could lead to the abandoning of the social obligation to those who are less able to pay, or to regions where this service is unprofitable.

·         Natural monopolies. Privatization will not result in true competition if a natural monopoly exists.

·         Concentration of wealth. Profits from successful enterprises end up in private, often foreign, hands instead of being available for the common good.

·         Political influence. Governments may more easily exert pressure on state-owned firms to help implementing government policy.

·         Profit. Private companies do not have any goal other than to maximize profits. A private company will serve the needs of those who are most willing (and able) to pay, as opposed to the needs of the majority, and are thus anti-democratic. The more necessary a good is, the lower the price elasticity of demand, as people will attempt to buy it no matter the price. In the case of price elasticity of demand is zero (perfectly inelastic good), demand part of supply and demand theories does not work.

·         Privatization and Poverty. It is acknowledged by many studies that there are winners and losers with privatization. The number of losers —which may add up to the size and severity of poverty—can be unexpectedly large if the method and process of privatization and how it is implemented are seriously flawed (e.g. lack of transparency leading to state-owned assets being appropriated at minuscule amounts by those with political connections, absence of regulatory institutions leading to transfer of monopoly rents from public to private sector, improper design and inadequate control of the privatization process leading to asset stripping.

·         Job Loss. Due to the additional financial burden placed on privatized companies to succeed without any government help, unlike the public companies, jobs could be lost to keep more money in the company.

يكون دوره إيجابيا إذا إحترمت المعايير والميكانيزمات في توزيع هذه الأعمال على فرق كل حسب إختصاصه، وفي أوقات محددة ومضبوطة سلفا بما يتماشى وسيرورة العمل بإنتظام وإطراد -خاصة إذا كان ميدان العمل قطاع إنتاجي- 

لهما دور سلبى لأن هناك روتين أو نظام للعمل يجب الألتزام به

سلبي

رداءةتوزيع المهام الوظيفية تعد احد اهم اسباب الفشل الاداري

توزيع المهام بعدالة ومنطق يحس الاداء ويضاعف الانتاجية ويعزز  ولاء الموظفين للمؤسسة