Start networking and exchanging professional insights

Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow

"In-house marketing is always better!" Do you agree with this statement? Why? If not, what would make you resort to a marketing agency?

user-image
Question added by Abeer AlSayed , Senior Media Relations Officer , Jordan River Foundation
Date Posted: 2017/01/24
Sunny Rizvi
by Sunny Rizvi , Director Of Operations , SPAN COMMUNICATIONS INC

Hi Abeer. Big subject, but I shall try and summarize my response (read between the lines for elaboration).

In-house marketing is a mixed bag, has its advantages. You have a team of people who are dedicated 24/7 to the marketing goals of their product/service. Their deep familiarity with the business blueprint of the company they work for (this is their only mandate), gives them a vantage point to drive growth, with most internal stakeholders on board (ideal picture).

Marketing companies, myself included, push back against this notion of 'dedication' citing limited, myopic vision which comes with this extreme 'internalization'. Not to mention the restricted flow of information which flows one-way - from the top down - with limited room for sincere debate or challenging of established (read 'management') opinion.

On the other hand, inviting an external agency to handle marketing for a company ensures a greater degree of openness of views, absence of bias, fresh infusion of ideas and most importantly, a two-way flow of information between the marketer and the marketed.  

More Questions Like This