Start networking and exchanging professional insights

Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow

Who would you rather have promoted, a lousy long time employee or a hard working new hire?

user-image
Question added by Audrey San Gabriel , Moderator , Bayt.com
Date Posted: 2017/03/27
Mohamad  Alhajj
by Mohamad Alhajj , Senior Service Engineer , Boushahri General Trading Group

Hard working new hire...since will reach the desired experience in short time ans with less expenses on the company...other than flexibility to afford additional tasks with out any complains.

Obaid ur Rehman
by Obaid ur Rehman , HR Executive , Al Bahr Al Arabi Marine Engineering Services

Hard working new hire deserves more in given scenario. 

Brian Kasoa
by Brian Kasoa , Security Guard , Janisam Chemicals

hard working new hire. its easier to teach a young dog new tricks

Suraj Abraham
by Suraj Abraham , GM - Sales & Marketing , Kora Trading & Contracting Co., Doha, Qatar

Undoubtedly the new hire to be promoted and in fact it will be a learning lesson for the old lousy employee to evaluate himself as to why this happened. From then on if he wants to correct and improve.

DENY VARGHESE
by DENY VARGHESE , SENIOR HR OFFICER , DR. MOHAMMED AL EMADI MEDICAL HOLDING GROUP

I would of course promote the new hire.

Mohamed Eissa
by Mohamed Eissa , Marketing & Social media Manager , Arab Association for Women and Children

I would promote the new hard working employee because that is better hundreds of times than an old bad and lazy employee

Said Kamha PhD
by Said Kamha PhD , Training Manager, Local Safety Officer -Middle East , MEDA

Promoting lousy long time employees sends a message that the system rewards lousiness specially when it stays for long time, whereas promoting hard working new hires sends a strong message that promotion is the reward for hard work not for staying long. This is the right message that should be sent to be properly received  

More Questions Like This