Register now or log in to join your professional community.
VMware is more efficient than Hyper-V and easy to manage in virtual environment and I have experience in VMware more than Hyper-V.
Hyper-V is in great use as it can be added in windows server and low cost. But VMware is always better for virtualization.
Hi
Am having Experience in Hyper-V more than VM Ware.
VMware platform having more stabilization.
I have extensive experience of both hypervisors in enterprise production environments. VMWare is the preferred choice. Hyper-V is good if you are lucky with hardware and manage to set up all the bells and whistles. Communications between Hyper-V Clustered Nodes can be impaired by something as simple as Symantec Firewall - these type of problems are avoided with VMware
Vmware Esxi is the best option insteed of Hyper-V.
VMware platform is more stabilized than hyper-V as it increases the redudancy and sustanbility
In terms of scalability, both Hyper-V and VMware now support maximum configurations available for top level enterprise servers:
Comparing the two hypervisors on a feature by feature basis doesn’t provide the value it used to because both technologies are more than capable of meeting the demands of most organizations. However each technology has differentiating capabilities that, depending on their importance, may sway you in one direction over the other.
VMware more stable, but expensive, Hyper-V 2016 will compete much more with VMware
VMware there is no competition with this organization.
VMWare is a leader in virtualization and technology
VMWare is the best software plateform in market for virtualiation.
VMWare easy to use and user friendly.
MS Hyper -v is very typical to use.
Vmware is the most reliable virtualization platform.cheaper than Hyper V.
