Bayt.com

Start networking and exchanging professional insights

Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow

There was a robbery in which a lot of goods were stolen. The robber(s) left in a truck. It is known that:

(1) Nobody else could have been involved other than A, B and C. (2) C never commits a crime without A's participation. (3) B does not know how to drive. So, is A innocent or guilty?

General Knowledge
user-image
Question added by Rehan Qureshi , Financial Consultant , Self Employeed
Date Posted: 2013/12/09
Upvote (8) Views (18) Followers (6) Answers (8) Report Question
Write an Answer
Register now or log in to answer.
Ahamed Shareef
by Ahamed Shareef , Divisional Head - Quality Assurance , Apollo Tyres Ltd

In your first condition, you implicated all the3 (A,B and C)!! And in the statement  makes all of them guilty!!

So A is guilty....

Rehan Qureshi
by Rehan Qureshi , Financial Consultant , Self Employeed

yes A is guilty

Ragesh Vadakkedath Ramachandran
by Ragesh Vadakkedath Ramachandran , IT Administrator , Nippon Motor Corporation (P) Ltd

A is guilty.

 

Reason,

 

1. B doesnt know how to drive , the robbers left in a truck that means either A or C supports B.

2. C cannot do a crime without A.

Rizwan Qureshi
by Rizwan Qureshi , Group Head of IT , Iengineering Group

AAAAAAA

Aysha Rehan
by Aysha Rehan , Customer Services Officer , National Data Base & Registration Authority Pakistan

Yes its simple A is guilty

Noman Qureshi
by Noman Qureshi , Assistant Division Manager , Al Baroom Group, Saudi Arabia

my vote is for A as guilty

Mohammad Tohamy Hussein Hussein
by Mohammad Tohamy Hussein Hussein , Chief Executive Officer & ERP Architect , Egyptian Software Group

A is guilty.

Write Your Answer
More Questions Like This