Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.
what will be the proper way to answer the following during a job interview>> are you welling to work in "another location" a diff city? other than just saying yes or no. because honestly .. one of the key factors to move a way is their offer. but that might be negative to mention!! let me know what u think.
Package on offer would mean less or more in particular region as per the cost of living in the place being considered. More than what may sound negative, it is the honesty in the reply that is important.
(Moving to another location could mean more savings, or peaceful living (away from traffic and noise), or something beneficial).
To answer this question: candidate can show interest in relocation and proactively inform about the benefits of relocation to certain places - cities / towns. The interviewer will get an idea of what types of places are you interested and why.
If my job responsibility requires travelling or relocation than the answer is surely "Yes". I am passionate about my work and my aim has always been to complete the job within the given timeline no matter what challanges I may have to face.
Being honest yet diplomatic when addressing the relocation question during a job interview is important. Since the relocation would be based on various factors, including the compensation package, you can express your openness to the idea without committing. Here is a possible approach:
“Thank you for raising that question. I am open to exploring opportunities that will be mutually beneficial and contribute positively to my career growth. Relocating to another city is a significant decision. I would consider it if the role and the overall package align with my career goals and personal circumstances. I am very interested in the position and excited about the potential of contributing to the team.”
This response shows that you are open to opportunities but also clarifies that your decision to relocate would be contingent on various factors. It avoids outright mention of compensation but implies that the overall package is one of the considerations. This is a balanced way of addressing the question without appearing to be focused solely on financial gain.