Communiquez avec les autres et partagez vos connaissances professionnelles

Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.

Suivre

Why does it seem like the gravitational mass of galaxies exceeds the mass of all the stuff we can see?

<p>Is there some missing "dark matter"?  If so, is it ordinary matter, neutrinos, or something more exotic?  If not, is there some problem with our understanding of gravity, or what?</p>

user-image
Question ajoutée par Vinod Jetley , Assistant General Manager , State Bank of India
Date de publication: 2014/09/18
Vinod Jetley
par Vinod Jetley , Assistant General Manager , State Bank of India

Since the late1990s, a consensus has emerged that some sort of "cold dark matter" is needed to explain all sorts of things we see.  For example, in2003 an analysis of data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe suggested that the energy density of the universe consists of about23% cold dark matter, as compared to only4% ordinary matter.  (The rest is dark energy.)

Unfortunately nobody knows what this cold dark matter is!  It probably can't be ordinary matter we've neglected, or neutrinos, since these wouldn't have been sufficiently "cold" in the early universe to collapse into the lumps needed for galaxy formation.  There are many theories about what it might be.  There's also still a possibility that we are very confused about something, like our theory of gravity.

More Questions Like This

Avez-vous besoin d'aide pour créer un CV ayant les mots-clés recherchés par les employeurs?