Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.
Quality of work with in dead line is the actual Point.
But Quality of Work is more important than dead line.
dead lines can be change but quality can't be change again and again.
Dead Line stands between mutual Understanding. it will be fine.
but Quality is tough to make fine. so quality of work is more important.
Quality of work is more important than meeting deadline and 'meeting deadline' is a quality of your work as well. If quality is not maintained the whole project will get affetced, deadlines are just delaying the commencement of the project but can be met deadlines if break downs are set off in the middle of the project.
Hello everybody,
My point of view is that both are important; we just have to respect deadlines insuring a good quality of goods.
Rgds
In the long run, higher quality results in more deliverables or less development time or both. But in the short run, you will see deadline overruns and you have to be prepared for that.
When you meet an immovable object, you have to give way. If deadlines cannot be changed or compromised, then something else will have to be gone instead. This should be best accomplished by reducing the feature set for the deadline release, but sometimes, at the individual level, quality takes a step back. Sometimes, the reduced quality may be imperceptible, but over time, it adds up to a poorer system that is less maintainable and less extensible.If you want to fix this, it is necessary to change the emphasis from “meet the deadline” to “meet the quality standards”. First improve quality, and only then examine productivity issues. If you try to improve productivity first, quality may decrease and also reduce net productivity as the team is pulled into fixing quality problems.
