Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.
Rules are clear, authority lines are designated and written into job descriptions.
Large organisations have to run along the lines of this type of system, where there is large staff with variable skills.
These large entities are governed by Policy and Policy Manuals, and staff are skilled up over their working careers, having clear targets and quality control processes. Human nature like to see the road map of working career, and feel safe in clearly defined boarders. It promotes consistency and teamwork.From the definition: A system of administration distinguished by its (1) clear hierarchy of authority, (2) rigid division of labor, (3) written and inflexible rules, regulations, and procedures, and (4) impersonal relationships.
Read more: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/bureaucracy.html#ixzz3cgnnKr8k
Top-level managers in bureaucratic organizational structures exercise a great deal of control over organizational strategy decisions, which is ideal for business owners with a command and control style. Strategic decision-making time can be shorter in a tall organizational structure, since less individuals are involved in the process. Standardization and best-practices are often highlights in companies with tall organizational structures, ensuring that work is consistently completed efficiently and effectively.
Bureaucratic control can be used when behavior can be controlled with market or price mechanisms.
I agree with the expert answers.
Briefly An advantage is it should always be clear who is responsible ,A disadvantage is the "message" gets distorted or lost..
Some advantage of bureaucracy: -Clear division of work with boundaries to responsibilities. -Formal (written) rules and procedures resulting in predictability and reutilization. -A well-defined hierarchy of authority.-Appointments to posts based on technical competence.-Formal (written) documentation of actions and decisions.-Bureaucratic control’ system is a strategic was based around internal labor market and the winning of employee commitment through the prospect of long term career advancement includes job security, pension packagesand Training & development. - Bureaucracies helped HRM in recruitment, performance appraisal, and other systems.-A bureaucratic system brings to the overall running and efficiency of a business and its employees. In a bureaucracy each employee of the organization knows precisely what their duties are within the organization, and therefore many tasks will be performed a lot quicker and more efficiently. The clear-cut rules set by bureaucratic systems also enable the organization...
Agreed to the experts............................................
You get what you desire because you have both ability and right to influence others to act in way you want it to be crafted. High level of stewardship can be observed in bureaucracy.
Management layers characterize bureaucratic organizations. The layers give bureaucracies a vertical thrust when laid out in an organizational chart. These "tall" organizations are the most traditional organizational structure. The functional structure is oldest, organizing around similar work activities such as sales or payroll. The divisional structure is similar. Complex companies use it to create autonomous divisions devoted to a type of customer, product or location before departmentalizing the divisions, usually into functional departments. The advisability of using a bureaucratic structure depends on the situation.
ControlWith so much management, bureaucratic structures have strong boundaries. Chains of command are clear, as are expectations and decision-making power. Authority is centralized instead of spread out among employees. Job descriptions are detailed and specialized. Over time, bureaucracies develop many rules to maintain the structure. Management can monitor outcomes, which lends itself to standard products or services and quality control.
MechanisticExerting tight control, a bureaucracy tends to function like a machine of many cogs and gears, each part serving the whole. While that may sound dystopian, viewing an organization as a machine allows management to concentrate on coordinating resources and effort. This mechanized business approach functions well in predictable environments. Mechanically humming along, the bureaucratic organization’s order meshes well with stability, allowing a company to move inexorably toward its strategic goals.
Economies of ScaleGrouping jobs by function breeds certain economies. Departments efficiently share resources. Meanwhile, the bureaucratic structure’s required job specialization leads to economies of scale as employees work repetitively and with increasing proficiency, efficiency and productivity.
Lack of ManeuverabilityThe very bureaucracy of tall structures prevents companies from maneuvering quickly. Changes in procedure must move through the chain of command for approval -- perhaps being Ok'd by several bosses -- then travel back down the chain for adoption. In a stable environment, such rigidity is not an issue. In volatile situations, though, this inability to quickly change directions can present real problems. A lumbering company cannot dodge sudden competitive threats.
Low MoraleThe more specialized a job, the more repetitive it is likely to be. Repetitive jobs bore employees, breeding dissatisfaction. Meanwhile, as mere cogs, employees aren’t judged for what they can uniquely bring to a job, but by how well they fulfill their functions. Employee disempowerment stems from the centralized power structure. With the bureaucracy holding authority, employees may feel helpless, passive and even indifferent to company goals.
RelevanceA company bringing up the rear in adjusting to market forces cannot be an industry leader. Meanwhile, the disempowered employees are not free to innovate to better position the company, especially in the face of sudden market shifts. Between the difficulty innovating and the lack of maneuverability, companies employing the bureaucratic structure run the risk of being irrelevant within their own industry.
1. Specialization: A bureaucratic organization provides the advantages of specialization because every member is assigned a specialized task to perform.
2. Structure: A structure of form is created by specifying the duties and responsibilities and reporting relationships within a command hierarchy. Structure sets the pace and framework for the functioning of the organization.
3. Rationality: A measure of objectivity is ensured by prescribing in advance the criteria far decision making in routine situations.
4. Predictability: The rules, regulations, specialization, structure and training import predictability and thereby ensure stability in the organization. Conformity to rules and roles in the structural framework bring about order to cope with complexity.