Start networking and exchanging professional insights

Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow

Which between Packet Tracer and gns3 is better suited for simulating MPLS vpn?

user-image
Question added by amos olweny , ICT Infrastructure Consultant , Xabit Dimensions Limited
Date Posted: 2016/07/18
Rashad Khan
by Rashad Khan , EARTHQUAKE RELIEF WORK

It better to use GNS3 as it is Professional / Expert level simulator

GNS3 is much better and if you want to simulate mpls vpn and more you can use web IOU

kamel ALOUI
by kamel ALOUI , خبير تقني , TUNISIE TELECOM

GNS3 can simulate MPLS vpn, but Packet Tracer cannot

Abdul Jahid Khan
by Abdul Jahid Khan , Sr. Manager - Design Consultant , TATA Communications

GNS3 is the best and cheapest option to simulate most complex networks.

Patrick Ybiernas
by Patrick Ybiernas , Senior Network Engineer

GNS3 because it simulates like the real router 

Ali Sarwan
by Ali Sarwan , Assistant Manager , Transworld Enterprise Services

PacketTracer is a simulator with limited commands supported, whereas GNS3 emulates the real IOS. So i would say GNS3. 

Mohamed Gomaa
by Mohamed Gomaa , Integration Solution Consultant – Networking expert , Orange Business Services

GNS3

better suited for simulating MPLS vpn

Salman Khan
by Salman Khan , IP/MPLS Senior Network Engineer , Mobily

GNS3 is good but it stop working sometimes b/w your practice lab,  its better to use Dynagen(Dynamips)! 

Kamran Khan
by Kamran Khan , Network Engineer , KoreLinks Technologies

For every advance router configuration GNS3 is better......But now the new tool UNL is best

Murad khan
by Murad khan , Network Security Engineer , GoldenChip Company

GNS 3.2 is much more Better and its a professional while Packet tracer have Limited work to do    

Hafiz Burhan Asif
by Hafiz Burhan Asif , Network Security Engineer , Ceenex Global Dubai

GNS3 is the most best practice for MPLS VPN 

More Questions Like This