Communiquez avec les autres et partagez vos connaissances professionnelles

Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.

Suivre

Which program is better intouch or wincc flexible ?

user-image
Question ajoutée par حسام ناجى , testing and commissioning engineer II , SENDAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY
Date de publication: 2013/09/30
muhammad arif
par muhammad arif , Assistant Engineer , Phoenix armour

WinCC is very good for Beginer or for small projects

for that WiCC is much peter for me

حسام ناجى
par حسام ناجى , testing and commissioning engineer II , SENDAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY

 i dealt with both but i prefer wicc flexible

hassan qutb
par hassan qutb , Facility&Engineering Manager PMP. , مقاولات خاصه

The selectiion of any program is depending on the users Experince , any of them is suitable if you can use it in the right way and if you have follow up system.

Thank you

Engr. Hassan Qutb

Mohammed abdu ahmed  Alraeeini
par Mohammed abdu ahmed Alraeeini , رئيس قسم الكهرباء , عالم الرؤية لانظمة الطاقة الشمسية

hifriends you forgot a clear difference.wincc flexible commonly used for configuring hmi panels.but wincc don't support this part.clearly simatic wincc is better than wincc flexible for scada and pc based monitoring.good luck

Maher Alasli
par Maher Alasli , service engineer , UNITED WEAVERS

the HMI systems WinCC flexible and Intouch both of them very  powerfull software and have great properties and can be used to configure nearly all SIMATIC operator devices.The functional scope comprises visualization tasks close to the machine as well as SCADA applications on PC-based  multi-user system but for us in arabic countries we used to WinCC because90 % of the machines in the factroies are Chinees and most of them used Siemens PLC with WInCC HMI system pased -pc  also we are beginer Porgramers for HMI systems if we compare oir selfs with Eruopean or Amircans or Japanees or CHnees also and WinCC is very good for Beginer or for small projects

for that WiCC is much peter for me

Amr Saleh
par Amr Saleh , Senior I&C technical office engineer , ENPPI

wonderware intouch is way better effects movement but it's not propriotary so it might make some problems

maha ahmed sayed elayat
par maha ahmed sayed elayat , تدريب , شركه سيمنز

i think wicc is more usable in egypt cause it is very easy

Mohamad Abd El-Azeem
par Mohamad Abd El-Azeem , Substation Automation Systems (SAS) Testing and Commissioning Engineer , ABB Automation Saudi Arabia

Both are good softwares. Wonderware Intouch is also easy and flexiable and supports many PLC types, but costs so much.

mahmoud soliman
par mahmoud soliman , Electrical Power & automation Engineer, MBA , EZZ Steel

Both packages are extremely powerful and can do anything you require,  I found the biggest difference is that of usability,  I have been using siemens WinCC and nowadays switched to wonderware Intouch. I have seen the facilities provided in WinCC are thousand time better than the wonderware. If you go by systematic way in WinCC nothing like it. The editor (WinCC CS) is wonderful. Simatic wincc is the best software for HMI. Its scripting is easier & report & alarms facilities are also more flexible in Wincc than wonderware.Even if you concentrate on graphic part, as per my knowledge & experience on wonderware, when you change the colours of the3D objects in wonderware durring runtime, it gives you2D effect. But in WinCC there is no problem. There are many other advantages of WinCC.   Wonderware Intouch  is also very good SCADA.   If i have to take decision then i will definitely go with WinCC.

best regards,

anas ali
par anas ali , electrical engineer , petrol

wincc

More Questions Like This