Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.
Some managers believe that the way to deal with their subordinates on different personalities
And temperament and denominated functional confined to follow the policy of the stick and carrot
While another group believes that this policy only in the short term but devastating in the long run
They may pay employees to leave the organization or dispose of passivity and the indifference towards their work and their superiors and colleagues.
However, as agreed by the two groups is that the payment of wages commensurate with the tasks required
Of each employee and the granting of bonuses is just a positive impact forces
On working in any institution of power and comes expert opinion contrary to the categories!
They reject the principle of money as a catalyst of the foundation ..hat believe that two employees
Type works for the work itself, which means that the money will not be a good catalyst for him,
And the type of work because it is in dire need of money to pass, has the energy to work 24 hours a day to earn more of it
It can be to manage money to motivate staff, but not the primary catalyst it may manifest in some cases
Director estimated that the performance of the employee, but at other times - not enough
If the employee is looking for encouragement and appreciation of the vision in the eyes around him, for example.
Encourage Toyota employees around the world for innovation and invention,
You can implement the idea, which he created in the case has all the powers and authorities
Without reference to any director or head, he can even control the whole production line if this AVI development interest
This method of dealing with employees is the top estimate and the biggest proof of the company's confidence in their employees, which motivates them to more creativity and work to maintain the company's success
Thank you for the invitation
in motivating people to elicit desired behaviors, sometimes the rewards are given in the form of money, promotion, and any other financial or non-financial benefits and sometimes the punishments are exerted to push an individual towards the desired behavior
full agree with answer given by Mr. Hisham
Well - the carrot-and-stick approach worked well for typical tasks of the early 20th century —routine, unchallenging and highly controlled. For these tasks, where the process is straightforward and lateral thinking is not required, rewards can provide a small motivational boost without any harmful side effects. But jobs in the 21st century have changed dramatically. They have become more complex, more interesting and more self-directed, and this is where the carrot-and-stick approach has become unstuck. In summary, the implications for managers in organizations are significant. Leaders today must be not just cognizant of the latest research on motivation, but take action to make those organizational and relationship changes to take advantage of this research. And care must be taken to simply conclude that our motivation is blindly driven by brain chemicals.
