Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.
yes, there is a liability of an accomplice per se in civil law. The liability in civil law of a person helping or aiding/abetting another person in committing a civil wrong is either jointly or severally depending on the facts of the case as well as the manner of the civil action brought by the party suffering the wromg. For example, the party aiding and abetting can be sued as an agent and the primary peron or persons by whom the wrong is intended or directed to be performed can be sued as a principal depending on the nature of the wrong committed.
Accomplice is a Criminal liability caused with the intent of the party, the wrong doer has to be certainly be penalized for the crime and compensation.
Of course if there is strong evidence
Liability in the Civil Code (as a source of obligation) is a contractual liability and a tort liability; that is, either as a result of your association with a contract (for example, your responsibility to pay insurance premiums) or your duty of careful for some things (like driven your car) The concept of the responsibility of the accomplice is linked to the commission of an offense, and the civil liability here is followed it to the question of compensation!
concept of accomplice is in Criminal law. one who is a partner in crime is called accomplice...so should be dealt in criminal law. Thanks.
Each error cause harm to others, requires compensation
