Communiquez avec les autres et partagez vos connaissances professionnelles

Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.

Suivre

Which is better,work to eliminate the risks or transfer it to third parties through insurance?

user-image
Question ajoutée par khalid shiltawi , Deputy General Manager | Operation Director | Leader of Manufacturing excellence Program , Obeikan Investment Group
Date de publication: 2017/03/01
Javad Taghavi
par Javad Taghavi , Program Manager, Senior Adviser in Project Management , KCE Co.

Generally the answer is "it depends". It depends on 1- types of risk 2- feasibility study of risks. For example, Sometimes the activities have risk are important parts of project then it is impossible to use AVOID strategy then you have to use other strategies like transfer. If they can be avoided then we should investigate about the cost of avoiding because avoid strategy means changing of PMP that it need to use more resource if the cost of avoiding is less than risk impact, Then it's better to use avoid

Mamoun elbaghir abdalla mhamad Eltayeb
par Mamoun elbaghir abdalla mhamad Eltayeb , Insurance agent / Producer , Albaraka Insurance Company

Whenever you are not able to avoid the risks , it better to transfer it to an insurance company , providing that applying any method to minimize the risk from your side will lead the insurance company to reduce the premium rate and the overall cost of insurance.

Thanking you

Amr Lotfy
par Amr Lotfy , Senior Advisor , Keepers Advisory

its depend on the cost of risk transfer, expected loss, risk appetite, cost of risk internally control

More Questions Like This

Avez-vous besoin d'aide pour créer un CV ayant les mots-clés recherchés par les employeurs?