Who would you rather have promoted, a lousy long time employee or a hard working new hire?

Question

Mohamad Alhajj · Answer

Hard working new hire...since will reach the desired experience in short time ans with less expenses on the company...other than flexibility to afford additional tasks with out any complains.

Obaid ur Rehman · Answer

Hard working new hire deserves more in given scenario.

Brian Kasoa · Answer

hard working new hire. its easier to teach a young dog new tricks

Suraj Abraham · Answer

Undoubtedly the new hire to be promoted and in fact it will be a learning lesson for the old lousy employee to evaluate himself as to why this happened. From then on if he wants to correct and improve.

DENY VARGHESE · Answer

I would of course promote the new hire.

Mohamed Eissa · Answer

I would promote the new hard working employee because that is better hundreds of times than an old bad and lazy employee

Said Kamha PhD · Answer

Promoting lousy long time employees sends a message that the system rewards lousiness specially when it stays for long time, whereas promoting hard working new hires sends a strong message that promotion is the reward for hard work not for staying long. This is the right message that should be sent to be properly received

Produits Par Bayt.com

Utilisez l'Appli de Bayt.com

Communiquez avec les autres et partagez vos connaissances professionnelles

Who would you rather have promoted, a lousy long time employee or a hard working new hire?

Recherches Populaires

More Questions Like This