Start networking and exchanging professional insights

Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow

Why is the performance appraisal model, "Forced Distribution" prevalently used by employers compared to other reliable performance management tools?

Does this show no one of the tools is authoritative in nature but dependent on the Employer's taste-value?

user-image
Question added by Deleted user
Date Posted: 2017/06/06
saleh tahat
by saleh tahat , Community Mobilization Officer , blumont

The Forced Distribution performance appraisal model, also known as "Rank and Yank" or "Bell Curve", is commonly used by employers because of its structured, comparative, and results-driven approach. Here’s why it is widely preferred compared to other performance management tools:

 

  1. Drives Differentiation & Eliminates Leniency Bias

Ensures that employees are ranked based on performance, preventing inflated ratings where everyone is rated as "above average."

Forces managers to differentiate between high, average, and low performers, reducing rating bias and favoritism.

  1. Promotes a Competitive Work Environment

Encourages a high-performance culture by rewarding top performers and identifying underperformers for improvement or dismissal.

Motivates employees to strive for excellence to avoid being placed in lower categories.

  1. Aligns with Compensation & Talent Management

Helps in performance-based pay decisions, ensuring that rewards and promotions go to top performers.

Assists in succession planning by identifying high-potential employees for leadership roles.

  1. Encourages Continuous Improvement & Accountability

Employees are aware of performance expectations and are encouraged to improve to remain competitive.

Helps organizations identify and manage low performers, facilitating training or exit strategies.

  1. Streamlines Large-Scale Performance Evaluation

Ideal for large organizations where subjective evaluations may be inconsistent across different teams.

Provides a structured framework to assess employees fairly across multiple departments.

  1. Easy Implementation & Standardization

Simple to apply across different levels of the organization.

Ensures uniformity in performance assessments, making it easier to analyze workforce trends.

Challenges & Criticism

While popular, the Forced Distribution model is criticized for:

 

Demotivating employees who are unfairly placed in lower rankings.

Not account for team dynamics, as it forces a fixed percentage into low-performance categories, even if all employees perform well.

Encouraging unhealthy competition leads to reduced teamwork and collaboration.

Conclusion

Despite its flaws, many employers use Forced Distribution because it standardizes performance evaluation, rewards excellence, and helps identify weak links. However, companies today are increasingly moving toward continuous performance management models that emphasize employee development, regular feedback, and a growth-oriented culture instead of rigid ranking systems

More Questions Like This