Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.
Our behaviour depend upon on the safety culture of any organization too, so we know when their are check and balances in a safety system we would behave safely but when we know that we can get away without being monitored we will always use that short cut
in my opinion , this would be related to how powerful safety polices and rules are applied on site , and how strong the management would help to enforce these rules, if the management is thinking about safety and profit wise ,, this project would be successful , however if the management is weak regarding applying safety policy / rules on site ... so safety will be the least priority
It depends opon the Safety policy and the cullture of the concerned company
Organisational behavioral state is a replica of the management take on any issue of context like in this case safety. Safety follows a Top-Down approach. Therefore the epileptic behavior of this individual could have been as a result of the poor safety culture (includes poor policies, no adequate trainings etc) due hugely to nonchalant safety behavior of the management.
There are three factors to be considered:
Organization factor,
Job factor and
Individual Factor
Organization factors:
Commitment from the top management,
Consultation and involvement of the worker
Communication
Safety Culture
Procedures and Policies
Peer group pressure
Level of Supervision
Resources
Training
Job Factors:
Task
Workload,
Environment,
Display and controls,
Policy and procedures,
Individual Factors:
Attitude
Risk perception
Incentives
If these factors will be positive, workers will behave safely
and if those will be negative, workers will behave unsafely.