Communiquez avec les autres et partagez vos connaissances professionnelles

Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.

Suivre

An auditor reported a corruption case,the manager promoted and transferred him and closed the case to conserve company's reputation,true or false?

user-image
Question ajoutée par Yousuf M. Y. Ababneh , Director (colonel) , electronic equipment department / public security directorate
Date de publication: 2013/11/11

False, doing such action will affect the credibility of the company,

instead, he should send the people involved in the corruption case  to jail to stay with rats , this will make them  meditate on what they have committed

Khaled Alhassoun
par Khaled Alhassoun , Consulting Management - Senior manager , Price waterhouse Coopers

False

bassam sabbagh
par bassam sabbagh , المشرف و المسؤول الفنّيّ , مديريّة صحّة اللاذقيّة-شعبة اللايشمانيا و الصّحّة البيئيّة

Acted wrongHurt the company

Joefil C. Jocson
par Joefil C. Jocson , CEO/President , Dyas Construction and Management Consultants

this is an issue of integrity. As an auditor, we stand by the rules. so complete the report of corruption as per complete documents, findings etc and submit the audit report to the upper Management with your recommendation. It's up to the Management to decide what to do with the employee for final conclusion.

entisar al kaiead/OTOOM
par entisar al kaiead/OTOOM , CPA Certified,director/of strategic investment programs department , Great Amman Municipality (GAM)

false 

to conserve company's reputation you have to follow the case.

 

Muhammad Rizwan Syed
par Muhammad Rizwan Syed , Manager Finance , Mirfa International Power & Water Co PJSC

True..The auditor during audit find a case of corruption that he reported to his manager. His manager realized his efforts and promoted him and assigned another assignment. Thats fine and normal... regarding the corruption file the manager needs to consider alot of things before making any decision. It depends on situation and circumstances what to decide. and usually this sort of decision is not taken individually. The audit committee must have decided to close the case for the sake of reputation and trust of investors. But on the other side must have implemented some action against the personnel involved in the case. like terminating thier contract. and implementing some controls against that corruption.

طﻻل صدقي عثمان arman
par طﻻل صدقي عثمان arman , رئيس مجلس اﻹدارة والمدير العام , شركة عرمان للهندسة والمقاوﻻت المحدودة

False, covering such actions will destroy the company in the near future.

Tanveer Ahmad Niazi
par Tanveer Ahmad Niazi , CEO (Self-employed) , Project Management Training & Consultant
Ahmad Salameh
par Ahmad Salameh , Deputy Resident Engineer- Technical and Quality Assurance Manager , Arabtech Jardaneh

True

Hello Yousuf,

your answer is clasical examle how to cover own made problems to the company. I have get through the anti corruption course and this was one of many cases which is very dishonest to themselves, the company and the customers. How could it be that auditor reported some kind of dismanaging, corruption and other illegal actions, told it to the manager who is responsible for the firm and after it awaiting what will be with his/her statement!

They both are not trustworthy. The access of the manager and the auditor are very unsound and dishonest.

The auditor had to report it to the owner of the firm and the manager couldnt offer promotion to the auditor only because he or her found something.

With best regards,

Mike H.

More Questions Like This