You can’t be a good leader unless you learn to fire people- known as "Managing out"- Any comments?

Yes, A leader must know how to fire people...!!

Today businesses have to take toughest decisions to take care of their stakeholders and survive in the business. It is quite common in highly volatile IT market. (Thats why they are paid much higher than other industries!!)

When situation demands, Manager must know "How to communicate tough decisions to employees" and "ensure parting with the employee" goes smooth. (May not be smooth in all situations)

To handle such situations, he must have knowledge following a write sequences so that he makes employee understand the difficulty an organization is facing.

Not at all, But some time it may be.

 In my opinion the the good leader is one who know how to hire the people, how to engage them and how to utilize their abilities to achieve the goal, and if necessary how to fire with a good manner.

Yes, a manager/leader must know how to replace staff and/or layoff staff and he/she must learn how to do that in the least disruptive manner possible.

(After all its about management)

Weak manager fire's employee-----------  (He know less about management)

Strong manager bring employee to track     ---------- .(^_^)

Sometimes you make a hiring mistake. Sometimes the organization outgrows the ability of a person. Sometimes people get too comfortable and complacent. The list goes on.

If someone isn’t performing at a high level it’s your responsibility as the leader to support them and help them improve. Sometimes you can, and sometimes you can’t.

If you can’t you must manage them out. Fast.

When I took my first general manager job a man named Stan was leader of the sales team. He was smart, charismatic, organized and popular with the team. The problem was that his mind was sealed shut regarding any possibility of change or improvement. If I asked Stan a question like “Is there room to improve sales training?” I’d always get the same answer: “No. We’ve done everything we can.” It was his standard answer for everything. This was absolutely unacceptable — there are always a thousand ways to improve anything.

I tried to pry open his mind and get him thinking proactively about how to change and improve. He remained stubbornly resistant.

After some time it began to dawn on me that Stan was not the right fit for sales leader. We were missing opportunities to improve and increase revenue growth due to his attitude.

Still I persisted. I wanted to give Stan another chance and be “fair.” “He just might get it” I thought. Plus I worried at how he would react if I asked him to leave and how it might affect the team. So I avoided the problem. I let the situation drag on for more than six months, hoping it would improve with more coaching.

It didn’t.

Eventually I had had enough. Stan had to go.

During our next one-to-one meeting I asked Stan whether he felt he was making progress toward his career goal of being a general manager. As expected, his answer was “no.” I told him it was clear that he wasn’t satisfied in the job and that he was just dialing it in. I encouraged him to open up and share his frustration, which he did.

After he had vented I made my move. “Stan, it seems like this job may not be the right fit for you. You seem unhappy. The job is not helping you achieve your goals. The team also needs someone who’s more switched on and enthusiastic.” Pause, then a firm “I think it’s best for you and for the team if you move on to your next challenge.” He knew his time was up. I felt he was embarrassed but also relieved. After some back and forth we agreed on a timetable.

A few months later Stan announced to the team that he had found a new opportunity. We sent him out like a rock star. Not only was he happier in his new job, but I found an outstanding sales leader who was all about continual improvement. It made a huge difference in our sales and customer service.

I learned a ton from this experience.

Tolerating a “just ok” performer on my team hurt everyone, including the low performer. I thought I was being “humane” and “fair” by not managing him out quickly. The reality is that I was just avoiding a problem instead of tackling it straight on. I was using the excuse of being humane to avoid an unpleasant task, just hoping against my better judgment that things would improve.

Perhaps my biggest lesson was that my slow decision-making cost Stan and the team valuable time and opportunity. I should have managed out Stan as soon as I concluded he wasn’t the right fit. Both parties would have been better off, sooner. It’s a lesson that has made me a better leader.

Have you fired anyone lately?

In my next post I'll explain how to lay the groundwork and manage someone out effectively.

Comments welcome !

A Good Leader will never favor such a situation and I feel this is a toughest call to take and Leader Should be Equipped with Competence to take toughest decisions in the interest of other employees and Organization.

Firing an Employee takes the same level experience,caution and selectivity involved in a hiring decision.This is a last resort when all the measures to rectify an employee have exhausted and there should be a no of opportunities given to the employee to rectify his/her behavior before firing decision is made.

I dont agree but they lader sometimes needs to fire some employees and he must always have the power and authority to do so

I think good leader must know how to handle instead how to fire, if no option left then we must opt  to fire.