Communiquez avec les autres et partagez vos connaissances professionnelles

Inscrivez-vous ou connectez-vous pour rejoindre votre communauté professionnelle.

Suivre

In the world of RISK MANAGEMENT, what is the difference between: 1- Risk appetite. 2- Risk tolerance?

user-image
Question ajoutée par Raafat Sallam , Organizational Development and Training Consultant , Training Centers, Marketing Organizations.
Date de publication: 2014/03/26
Abid Waheed
par Abid Waheed

Wilingness to take risk (Risk apitite) in line with the theory of higher return with higher risk.

Potential /ability to take risk (Risk tolerance)

Almutaz Bakry Sidahmed
par Almutaz Bakry Sidahmed , Internal Audit Manager , Banan real estate

Risk appetite: is the amount of risk an entity is willing to accept in pursuit of value. It is strategic guidepost in strategy setting.

Risk Tolerance: is the acceptable level of variation relative to acheivement of specific objective, and often is best measured in the same units as those used to measure the related objective. risk tolerance is tactical.

 

NASSRELDEEN IBRAHIM ELTAYP BASHEER
par NASSRELDEEN IBRAHIM ELTAYP BASHEER , Senior Bussiness Solution Support Engineer , MTN Sudan

  •  

  • Risk tolerance: the specific maximum risk that an organization is willing to take regarding each relevant risk.

  • Risk appetite: the amount and type of risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its business objectives. it is related to the company stratigic (board & exective)

Mark John Domingo
par Mark John Domingo , General Accountant , Palma Holding

Risk appetite is a higher level statement that considers broadly the levels of risks that management deems acceptable while risk tolerances are more narrow and set the acceptable level of variation around objectives.

 

To explain it simply, risk appetite is broader statement than risk tolerance. Risk tolerance is more specific.

 

More Questions Like This